The users can capture a screenshot, store it, and send it.
The users can download their own screenshots made earlier
The users can assign tags to a screenshot.
Users can share screenshots with their friends to view them.
The users can change the size of images and its properties before uploading.
The users can remove their screenshots.
The uses can download the platform-dependent client application to capture the screenshot.
We should have the client applications for web, mobile, and desktop.
If users upload a new screenshot, it will be available in 100 milliseconds.
The users can upload a screenshot maximum 1 MB.
Users may choose the users with whom they share the screenshots or make a screenshot public.
The platform should be designed to handle a high number of concurrent users efficiently. This might involve implementing techniques like load balancing and caching to distribute requests and minimize response times.
The system architecture should allow for horizontal scaling to accommodate increasing user traffic and data volume. This could involve using distributed databases and cloud-based infrastructure.
User data, including passwords and personal information, should be securely stored using encryption techniques.
The user interface (UI) should be intuitive and user-friendly for both novice and experienced users. A clean and well-organized UI with clear navigation elements will enhance user experience
Here's the calculation for storage requirements based on the provided assumptions:
Therefore, based on the assumptions, the estimated storage requirement for the system would be around 370 Petabytes per year.
Here's a breakdown of the essential API for our Multi-Device Screenshot Capture System.
User Management APIs:
Screenshot Management APIs:
Database Choices:
User :
Database type: SQL (MySQL, PostgreSQL)
Reasoning: user data requires strong consistency and ACID transactions.
Screenshot:
Database type: NoSQL (DynamoDB)
Reasoning: It may work with eventual consistency.
HashTag and Permission:
Database type: SQL (MySQL)
Reasoning: they require strong consistency and ACID transactions.
Data partitioning strategy:
Reasoning: User Id is a natural partitioning key as users primarily interact with user their data and advertisements. Sharding by User Id distributes load across servers and facilitates horizontal scaling for the user and screenshot data.
Sharding strategy: User Id provides a well-defined partition key for efficient data distribution and horizontal scaling based on user base growth. This approach keeps user data and related screenshots together on the same shards.
Here's a breakdown of essential components and services required to build your Multi-Device Screenshot Capture System.
Client application: Many types of client applications for web, mobile, and desktop.
Responsibilities:
API Gateway: API Gateway software - Apigee, Istio, AWS API Gateway.
Responsibilities:
User Service: Manage user activity, including user creation, removal, and searching.
Responsibilities:
Upload service: manage to either upload or download the screenshots by user demands.
Responsibilities:
Search service: look for the screenshot information by keywords.
Responsibilities:
Permission service: manage the user's permission to work with a screenshot.
Responsibilities:
Notification Service: listen to Kafka about new screenshots and connected users, and store that information to Redis.
Responsibilities:
CDN: store the screenshots closest to clients.
Security layer: Secure communication protocols (HTTPS), authentication, and authorization mechanisms, intrusion detection/prevention systems.
Responsibilities:
Let's delve deeper into the individual components of our
Multi-Device Screenshot Capture system, exploring their
functionalities, scalability considerations, and potential algorithms/data structures.
All services will be deployed to the AWS EKS. Kubernetes manages every service. Kubernetes can autoscale every service based on workload, and it cares about service availability by restarting pods if a service fails.
API Gateway:
Technology stack: Apigee, AWS API Gateway
Functionalities:
Scalability: API gateways are generally designed to handle high volumes of requests. They can be scaled horizontally by adding more instances behind a load balancer.
Algorithms/Data structures: Routing algorithms like path-based routing or content-based routing can be used to efficiently direct requests to backed services.
Client application:
Technology stack: Kotlin, React, or C++.
Functionalities:
Scalability: Use multithreads to optimize the client application execution.
Algorithms/Data structures: Split the screenshot into equal blocks to transfer it to the Upload service reliably. If one block fails to transfer, the client application retries to transfer.
Before downloading of a screenshot, the client application requests a block hash list to compare with what the client application already has.
Messaging service for real-time streaming of messages:
Optimizing the messaging service for real-time streaming of messages with reliable delivery and message ordering in a distributed system requires a multi-faceted approach. Here's how you can achieve this:
Technology Stack:
Message Delivery Guarantees:
Message Ordering:
Scalability:
Real-time Streaming:
Upload service: process the request to upload or download the screenshots.
Technology stack: Kotlin, Java, Go.
Functionalities:
Scalability: Use Kubernetes to scale the Upload service based on workload.
Algorithms/Data structures: Use the data block transfer: split the screenshots by equal block to transfer it and it makes it easier to repeat the transfer of one piece of a screenshot not the whole screenshot file.
The client application: if it fails, it may lose the last saved screenshot if the client application doesn't have time to persist the screenshot locally. It's a critical issue.
Solution: persist a screenshot immediately before uploading it to the backend.
The API Gateway: if it's down, the entire system cannot process user requests.
Solution: Deploy the service to different zones and replicate the data between them.
What are some future improvements you would make? How would you mitigate the failure scenario(s) you described above?