Data Storage:
Map Data: Estimated at 1 Petabyte (PB).
Traffic Data: Hundreds of TB daily.
Assuming 500 TB/day, 500 TB * 365 days = 182,500 TB annually.
POI (Point of Interest) Data: Estimated over 100 TB.
Server Resources:
Processing Power: Handling billions of user requests and real-time updates requires massive computational power.
Memory and Storage:
Each server needs sufficient memory and local storage to handle tasks efficiently.
Server specifications vary based on their purpose (rendering, routing, search).
Network Bandwidth:
User Requests:
Billions of requests daily for map tiles, navigation, and POI searches.
Assuming an average of 10 TB of data transferred per request, 10 TB * 1 billion requests = 10,000,000 TB or 10,000 PB of daily bandwidth.
Overall Capacity:
Data Storage: Potentially several Exabytes (EB).
1 EB = 1,000 PB
Servers: Millions globally.
Network Bandwidth: Massive, spanning multiple continents.
For various operations, the APIs use common HTTP methods like GET, POST, and PUT:
A distributed database architecture is used by Google Maps to provide scalability and reliability. For real-time analytics, they might use Bigtable on Google Cloud, and for structured data, they might use Cloud SQL, a relational database.
Our system should be highly scalable. It should employ a number of strategies, such as the following, to manage numerous concurrent users and requests:
Explain how the request flows from end to end in your high level design. Also you could draw a sequence diagram using the diagramming tool to enhance your explanation...
Dig deeper into 2-3 components and explain in detail how they work. For example, how well does each component scale? Any relevant algorithm or data structure you like to use for a component? Also you could draw a diagram using the diagramming tool to enhance your design...
Explain any trade offs you have made and why you made certain tech choices...
Try to discuss as many failure scenarios/bottlenecks as possible.
What are some future improvements you would make? How would you mitigate the failure scenario(s) you described above?