List functional requirements for the system (Ask the chat bot for hints if stuck.)...
1.when user give a long url, the system should encode a short url and return back to user.
2.when user give a short url, the system should decode back the original long url and return back to user.
3.when user delete a url, the system should delete the relationship between long and short url.
4.an url should have an expiration date, based on the usage of the url.
5.user should be able to register and login into our tinyurl system
1.the system should low latency
2.the system should be fault taulrent, we should avoid single point of failure
3.the system should be able to scalable, based on the input volumn
lets estimate the short to long traffic is 10 times higher than long to short. if every second there is 10000/s long to short request, then short to long request would be 100000/s
supposed each host capacity is 1000 connection, then we would need 10 host for the long to short and 100 hosts for the short to long.
suppose long to short avg string length is 100 char, which is 100 byte, and our input rate would be 100B * 10000/s which is 1000KB/s and 1MB/s. and for 1 day, it will spend 1MB * 60 * 60 * 24 = 86400 MB which is 86.4GB storage
when user give a long url it should return back short url, we need one API, String longToShort(String longURL);
when user give a short url, it should return back long url, we need one API, String shortToLong(String shortURL);
when user give a short url and want to delete it, we need a API boolean deleteURL(String shortURL)
when user want to register, we need one API
boolean register(UserInfo user)
when user want to login, we need one API
boolean login(UserInfo user)
we need two db, one is for long short url mapping, another one is for user info
For the URL storage database, you mentioned four columns:
For the user database, you mentioned four columns as well:
Databases:
Load Balancer:
API Gateway:
In this architecture:
for registration flow, we need to check first if user already exists or not
for the login process, if validate succeed, we will generate a bear token back to user and later everytime when user send request we will check the bear token in API gateway layer
For the registration process:
For the login process:
For url logic
Dig deeper into 2-3 components and explain in detail how they work. For example, how well does each component scale? Any relevant algorithm or data structure you like to use for a component? Also you could draw a diagram using the diagramming tool to enhance your design...
Using a NoSQL database like Amazon DynamoDB for the URL shortening service, especially when complex queries are not required, is a good choice due to its scalability and performance capabilities. Having separate tables for URL storage and user information simplifies the data model and enhances scalability.
To visualize the database design with DynamoDB and the scaling options, let's outline the components:
Let's summarize this in a high-level design diagram:
Using the Base64 encoding algorithm to convert long URLs to short URLs is a common and straightforward approach in URL shortening services. Let's incorporate this algorithm into the system design:
By applying the Base64 encoding algorithm within the system, we can efficiently generate short URLs for the given long URLs. This algorithm simplifies the process and provides a concise representation of the original URLs.
Utilizing an API Gateway for handling authentication, authorization, and rate limiting in the system is a common practice to enforce security and control access to APIs effectively. With the API Gateway, you can centralize these functionalities and easily manage them across the system.
By leveraging the API Gateway for these crucial functionalities, you can enhance the security and performance of the system while simplifying the management of access controls.
Load Balancer:
Indeed, there is a trade-off between using a relational database (RDBMS) and a NoSQL database for systems like a URL shortening service. Relational databases offer the advantage of supporting complex join queries, allowing for more sophisticated data analysis, insights, and logic efficiently. Here are some considerations for using a relational database:
However, it's important to balance the need for complex queries with the scalability requirements and performance considerations of the system. NoSQL databases like DynamoDB offer scalability, flexibility, and quick access to data, making them a suitable choice for systems with high throughput and simpler query needs.
For a URL shortening service that primarily focuses on storing URLs and user information without the need for complex queries or relationships between entities, a NoSQL database would be a good fit. If the system later requires more advanced analytics or relationships between user and URL data, a relational database might be a better option.
Ultimately, the choice between a relational database and a NoSQL database depends on the specific requirements, scalability needs, and data access patterns of the system.
Considering these factors, implementing authentication in the system provides enhanced security and control over user access while enabling features like request throttling for efficient resource management. While it may add complexity and potentially increase latency, the security benefits and control mechanisms it offers can outweigh these drawbacks, especially in systems handling sensitive or critical data.
Handling hot URLs, where a few URLs receive a disproportionately high volume of requests, can indeed create performance bottlenecks, especially in the context of database IO limitations. To address this issue, we can consider implementing caching mechanisms to alleviate the load on the database and improve response times for frequently accessed URLs: