AWS Ultra Low Latency Read/Write Data Store EFS vs Dynamodb DAX vs ElastiCache
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Overview
Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers several solutions tailored to meet the needs of applications requiring ultra-low latency for reading and writing data. Three prominent options include the Elastic File System (EFS), DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX), and Amazon ElastiCache. Although each solution serves a unique purpose, they might overlap in certain use cases, offering trade-offs around scalability, flexibility, and cost.
AWS Elastic File System (EFS)
Amazon EFS is a scalable and fully managed Network File System (NFS) for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. It’s ideal for scenarios where applications require a shared file storage facility with file system semantics.
Technical Specifications:
- Latency: EFS offers low-latency access over the network using NFSv4 protocol.
- Consistency: Strong consistency, which means changes are immediately visible across mounts.
- Scalability: Automatically scales the file system storage based on workloads.
- Throughput Modes: Supports burst throughput and provisioned throughput.
Use Cases:
- Content management systems, home directories, and web server farms.
- Applications that need shared access to files and require file system capabilities.
Example:
A content management platform requiring shared access to files amongst multiple application instances could mount EFS, benefiting from both scalability and strong consistency.
DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
DAX is a caching service specifically designed for accelerating Amazon DynamoDB workloads by up to 10 times, making read operations ultra-fast without requiring changes in application logic.
Technical Specifications:
- Latency: Single-digit microsecond reads.
- Data Model: Supports the same data model as DynamoDB, providing seamless integration.
- Consistency: Tunable reads with eventual and strong consistency available.
- Scalability: Transparent, horizontal scaling to several nodes.
Use Cases:
- High-performance applications such as real-time bidding or gaming leaderboards.
- Scenarios where read latency directly impacts user experience.
Example:
An online gaming leaderboard where players continuously check their rankings would leverage DAX to ensure that high-frequency read queries have minimal latency.
Amazon ElastiCache
ElastiCache enables the deployment, operation, and scaling of in-memory cache environments, allowing for ultra-fast data retrieval through caching layers built on Redis or Memcached engines.
Technical Specifications:
- Latency: Sub-millisecond, as data is fetched from memory.
- Data Model: Key-value store, suitable for session management, caching, and more.
- Consistency: Strong read-after-write consistency with Redis; configurable with Memcached.
- Scalability: Easily scales vertically or horizontally.
Use Cases:
- Caching frequently accessed data for web applications, reducing latency and backend load.
- Session storage for applications, or caching results of expensive database queries.
Example:
A web application experiencing slow database queries for popular pages can implement ElastiCache, caching the results and delivering them to users with minimal delay.
Comparative Summary
| Feature | EFS | DAX | ElastiCache |
| Latency | Low latency using NFS | Single-digit microsecond reads | Sub-millisecond from memory |
| Consistency | Strong file consistency | Tunable: eventual or strong | Strong (Redis) / Configurable (Memcached) |
| Data Model | File system semantics | DynamoDB Table data | Key-value store |
| Scalability | Automatically scales based on workload | Horizontal scaling, transparent to applications | Vertical/Horizontal scaling available |
| Best Use Cases | Shared file access, file storage, CMS | Real-time applications, gaming leaderboards | Web app caching, session management, database query caching |
| Integration | For workload requiring POSIX file semantics | Seamless integration with DynamoDB | Works with many web services, supports Redis/Memcached |
| Cost Consideration | Pay for throughput and storage | Pay for the instance capacity and data transfer within the cache | Pay for instance size and number, plus associated data transfer |
Additional Considerations
When deciding between AWS EFS, DAX, and ElastiCache, other factors such as the total cost of ownership, integration complexity, and specific application architecture requirements must be considered. While EFS suits scenarios demanding shared file system semantics, DAX and ElastiCache are more suitable when the main objective is to achieve ultra-low latency reads through caching mechanisms.
Considering these aspects, organizations can make informed decisions to optimize performance while balancing cost within AWS’s comprehensive cloud ecosystem.

