Difference between Interceptor and Filter in Spring MVC
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Introduction
When developing web applications using Spring MVC, it's essential to understand the behavior of components known as Interceptors and Filters. These components are central to handling HTTP requests and responses in a uniform manner, supporting features like authentication, logging, and caching. Despite their similarities, Interceptors and Filters have distinct roles and characteristics. This article delves into their differences, architectures, and the scenarios where each should be used.
Understanding Spring MVC Interceptors
What is an Interceptor?
In Spring MVC, Interceptors play a crucial role in processing requests. They are used to intercept HTTP requests and handle them before or after they reach the controller. Interceptors in Spring MVC are part of the org.springframework.web.servlet.HandlerInterceptor interface, and they work within the DispatcherServlet flow.
Lifecycle of an Interceptor
Interceptors operate at three intercept points:
- Pre-Handle: Executed before the request is sent to the controller.
- Post-Handle: Called after the controller has processed the request.
- After-Completion: Runs after the complete request has been processed and the view is rendered.
Common Use Cases for Interceptors
- Logging and monitoring: Capturing request data or response times for auditing purposes.
- Authentication and authorization: Validating user credentials before reaching the controller.
- Custom header manipulation: Adding additional HTTP headers prior to view rendering.
Understanding Filters
What is a Filter?
Filters are part of the Java Servlet specification (javax.servlet.Filter) and act on requests before they reach a servlet. While they're not specific to Spring MVC, they are often used in Spring-based applications to provide consistent request and response handling.
Lifecycle of a Filter
Filters execute logic at two main points:
- Request Filtering: Before the request is handled by the servlet.
- Response Filtering: After the request has been processed and a response is generated.
Common Use Cases for Filters
- Compression: Applying gzip or other compression to HTTP responses.
- CORS filtration: Handling Cross-Origin Resource Sharing policies.
- Request validation: Screening requests for particular parameters or attributes.
Key Differences Between Interceptors and Filters
| Aspect | Interceptor | Filter |
| API Level | Spring MVC specific (HandlerInterceptor). | Servlet specification (javax.servlet.Filter). |
| Lifecycle | Operates around the MVC controller. | Runs at a lower level, around the DispatcherServlet. |
| Purpose | Typically used for request pre-processing and post-processing. | Can modify request and response data before reaching the MVC layer. |
| Execution Order | Can be configured with ordered priorities. | Depends on their declaration order in the web.xml or application. |
| Request Scope | Tied closely to the Spring MVC request lifecycle. | Generically applicable to any servlet-based application. |
| Common Functionality | Authentication, authorization, logging, and model data manipulation. | Cross-cutting concerns like logging, compression, or header setting. |
When to Use Interceptors vs. Filters
Use Interceptors When:
- You need to interact directly with Spring MVC controller logic.
- Functionality is primarily concerned with request processing, rendering, or changing model attributes.
- You're seeking integration points specifically tailored to MVC processing.
Use Filters When:
- Reasons are application-agnostic and need to reside at a level below Spring MVC, such as application security or request manipulation.
- You need to handle tasks like content type checking, XSS filtering, or request encoding.
- Maintaining general servlet-based process tasks which are outside Spring MVC.
Conclusion
Spring MVC Interceptors and Filters both offer powerful ways to manage requests and responses in web applications, but they should be applied based on specific needs and scenarios. Understanding their differences and functionality can lead to more efficient and maintainable application architecture, enhancing flexibility and performance in your web projects.
By properly coordinating the use of both these components, developers can effectively harness the full capabilities of their Spring MVC applications to meet a wide array of project requirements.

