Difference between Keras model.save and model.save_weights?
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Keras is a widely-used deep learning library due to its user-friendly API and flexibility to run on top of TensorFlow, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit (CNTK), or Theano. One of the essential aspects of working with machine learning models is being able to save and restore them. This ensures that we do not need to retrain the model from scratch every time we want to use it. In Keras, two primary functions handle this task: model.save() and model.save_weights(). Understanding the difference between these two methods is crucial for efficient model serialization and deserialization.
Keras Model Saving: An Overview
Keras provides the flexibility to save models in different formats depending on user requirements:
- Complete Model configuration and weights
- Only the model weights
Both options have their use-cases and understanding these differences will help you choose the right method.
Model Serialization
Serialization refers to converting the model's state into a format that can be easily saved to disk and later reconstructed.
model.save(filepath, ...)
The model.save() method saves the entire Keras model. This includes:
- Architecture/Configuration: The architecture of the model, for instance, the layers, their order, and their parameters.
- Weights: The learned parameters after model training.
- Optimizer Configuration: If you use an optimizer along with the model, its state will also be included in the saved file.
The file is saved as an HDF5 file, which is an efficient data storage format. To load the model back, you can use keras.models.load_model(filepath).
Advantages:
- Complete Reproducibility: Since this method saves the complete configuration, you can easily reload the model later without worrying about its architecture or compilation.
- Convenience: Even the optimizer state is saved, enabling one to resume training from where it was left off.
Limitations:
- File Size: Larger file size due to inclusion of the entire architecture and optimizer settings.
model.save_weights(filepath, ...)
The model.save_weights() function saves only the weights of the model. The architecture and optimizer state are not saved.
To reload a model with weights saved with model.save_weights(), you must reconstruct the original model architecture and compile it before loading the weights.
Advantages:
- Size Efficiency: Results in smaller file size because only the weights are saved.
- Flexibility: If you have multiple variations of a model (e.g., different architectures or optimizers), you can apply a single set of weights to them.
Limitations:
- More Complexity: The architecture must be manually defined and the model must be compiled before loading weights, introducing a potential source of error.
Practical Examples
Example Scenario
Let's say we have a deep learning model to classify images, and we want to save it:
If tomorrow you want to load the weights into a new model, you would have to define the architecture first:
Summary Table
| Feature | model.save() | model.save_weights() |
| Components Saved | Architecture, Weights, Optimizer Configuration | Only Weights |
| File Format | HDF5 | HDF5 |
| Reconstruction | Directly reload using load_model | Requires manual architecture reconstruction |
| File Size | Larger | Smaller |
| Use-case Suitability | Complete model state saving for reproducibility | For sharing/testing different architectures |
In conclusion, choosing between model.save() and model.save_weights() depends on your specific requirements. If you need to ensure full model reproducibility and ease of use, model.save() is the better option. However, for scenarios where architecture flexibility is more important, or disk space is limited, model.save_weights() provides a leaner alternative.
Understanding these nuances allows you to make strategic decisions that best suit your development and deployment needs.

