Docker difference postgres12 from postgres12-alpine
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Overview
Docker is a powerful platform that allows for the creation, deployment, and management of containerized applications. In the realm of database management, PostgreSQL is a popular choice due to its robustness and feature set. When using Docker, you have multiple image variants to choose from, specifically postgres:12 and postgres:12-alpine. In our exploration, we will dissect the differences between these two Docker images.
Understanding Docker Images
A Docker image is a package that includes everything needed to run a piece of software: the code, a runtime, libraries, environment variables, and configuration files. When you pull an image like postgres:12, you are retrieving a pre-configured setup designed to run PostgreSQL version 12.
Postgres:12
- Base Image: The
postgres:12image uses Debian as its base operating system. - Size: Because of the richer feature set and additional shippable options, the image size generally exceeds 200MB.
- Features: Includes a full set of Unix utilities, libraries, and tools, which makes it a fully-fledged system with all Postgres features enabled.
Postgres:12-Alpine
- Base Image: The
postgres:12-alpineimage uses Alpine Linux as its foundation. - Size: The Alpine variant is significantly smaller, usually around 40-60MB in size, which makes it a “lightweight” option.
- Features: Optimized for minimal footprint and relies on Alpine's Musl libc instead of the standard glibc, which could lead to compatibility issues with certain applications or libraries that expect glibc.
Technical Differences
Operating System
- Debian (Postgres:12)
- Uses the glibc library for the GNU C standard libraries, widely adopted and tested.
- Better suited for applications needing a full Unix-like environment.
- Alpine Linux (Postgres:12-Alpine)
- Employs Musl libc, a lightweight, fast, and simple alternative to glibc.
- Ideal for environments where resources are limited.
Image Size and Performance
- Size:
- Alpine images are smaller and lead to reduced storage space usage.
- Alpine images may load faster due to their reduced size.
- Performance:
- Alpine images may not always be faster due to differences in library implementations and possible inefficiencies with Musl libc.
- Benchmarks vary; performance test with your specific workload is essential.
Security and Maintenance
- Security:
- Smaller base images reduce the attack surface.
- Both images are regularly updated to patch vulnerabilities, but Debian’s ecosystem has broader support.
- Maintenance:
- Both images require keeping up with updates, but Alpine may necessitate more robust testing post-update due to its minimal nature.
Use Cases and Recommendations
Postgres:12
- Use when a complete POSIX-compliant environment is needed.
- Best for compatibility and when using software that expects glibc.
- Suitable when storage size is not a constraint.
Postgres:12-Alpine
- Ideal for lightweight, resource-constrained environments.
- Perfect if download size and speed are priorities.
- Recommend extensive testing for compatibility with all required libraries.
Example Commands
To pull the postgres:12 image:

