Does anyone know of a asynchronous mysql lib for python?
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Introduction
Yes, Python has asynchronous MySQL options. The main question is not whether async libraries exist, but whether you want a low-level async driver directly or an ORM and engine layer such as SQLAlchemy's asyncio support on top of an async MySQL driver.
Common Async MySQL Choices
Two names that come up repeatedly are aiomysql and asyncmy.
aiomysql is an asyncio-based MySQL client with direct connection, cursor, and pool support. It is a straightforward option when you want an async DB-API-like interface and are comfortable writing SQL yourself.
asyncmy is another async MySQL driver. SQLAlchemy's async documentation supports it through the mysql+asyncmy dialect, which makes it relevant if you already use SQLAlchemy's async engine and session APIs.
Direct Usage With aiomysql
If you want a direct driver without an ORM, aiomysql is easy to understand:
This style is appropriate when you want explicit control over queries and transaction boundaries without adding ORM machinery.
Connection Pools Matter in Async Code
Opening a new database connection for every request is expensive. Async code benefits from pooling for exactly the same reason sync code does.
If your application serves concurrent requests, a pool should be the default starting point.
Async MySQL With SQLAlchemy
If you prefer SQLAlchemy's async engine, SQLAlchemy documents async MySQL dialects for both asyncmy and aiomysql.
You can swap the URL prefix to mysql+aiomysql:// if that driver better fits your environment.
How to Choose Between Them
Use a direct driver such as aiomysql when:
- you want lightweight async SQL execution,
- you do not need ORM features,
- and you are comfortable managing SQL statements yourself.
Use SQLAlchemy async when:
- your project already depends on SQLAlchemy,
- you want async sessions and engine management,
- or you need a path between ORM models and raw SQL execution.
The choice is usually architectural, not just about driver performance.
Async Does Not Remove Database Limits
Async I/O helps your Python process avoid blocking on socket waits, but it does not make slow queries fast. Poor indexing, long transactions, and too many concurrent writes still hurt throughput.
So if a synchronous app is slow because the SQL itself is inefficient, switching libraries will not solve the underlying database problem.
Common Pitfalls
The biggest mistake is mixing sync and async database code in the same request path without being deliberate. If you call a blocking MySQL client from inside async handlers, you lose the main benefit of async execution.
Another issue is skipping connection pooling. Async applications can create many concurrent tasks, and opening fresh connections in each one adds latency and load.
Developers also sometimes assume every MySQL driver is async just because it works under SQLAlchemy. Be explicit about whether the driver and engine are actually using the asyncio extension.
Finally, choose async because your application structure benefits from it, not just because it sounds modern. For a simple script or low-concurrency job, synchronous code is often easier to maintain.
Summary
- Python does have async MySQL options, notably
aiomysqlandasyncmy. - '
aiomysqlis a directasyncioclient for MySQL access.' - SQLAlchemy async supports both
mysql+aiomysqlandmysql+asyncmy. - Connection pooling is still important in async applications.
- Async improves waiting behavior, but it does not replace query tuning or schema design.

