How disable Copy, Cut, Select, Select All in UITextView
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Introduction
Sometimes a UITextView should display sensitive or controlled text that users can read but not copy, cut, or select. Typical cases include DRM-constrained content, exam apps, or in-app views where text extraction is explicitly disallowed by product policy. On iOS, default text interactions expose the edit menu and selection handles, so you need a custom subclass to disable specific actions.
The important point is scope. You should disable interactions only where truly required, because removing familiar editing behavior impacts accessibility and user trust. A clean implementation overrides action routing and selection capability while keeping layout and rendering intact. This article provides a production-friendly Swift approach with clear limitations.
Core Sections
Subclass UITextView and block menu actions
Override canPerformAction(_:withSender:) to reject actions you do not want.
This removes those items from the UIMenu when user long-presses.
Disable text selection behavior
Blocking menu items alone may still allow selection handles in some cases. Disable selection at the control level.
This prevents caret and selection UI from appearing.
Configure interaction and editability correctly
Set text view flags to match your intended UX.
If users should still type but not copy/cut/select, keep isEditable = true and adjust overrides carefully for allowed actions.
iOS 16+ edit menu integration
Newer iOS versions route menus through UIEditMenuInteraction. The action override still works, but test on target OS versions because menu presentation behavior evolves.
Use this only if you want to suppress the entire standard edit menu for that view.
Re-enable actions selectively
Sometimes you want to allow copy but block cut/paste. Keep policy explicit.
Inside canPerformAction, branch on policy rather than hard-coding one permanent behavior. This makes future product changes safer.
Accessibility and UX fallback
When restricting selection, offer alternatives for users relying on assistive tools.
If policy allows, provide a controlled export/share button that logs user intent and preserves auditability.
Common Pitfalls
- Disabling text interactions globally across the app instead of only in views with explicit security or policy requirements.
- Overriding menu actions but forgetting selection/caret methods, leaving partial interaction states.
- Using private APIs to suppress editing behavior, which risks App Store rejection.
- Ignoring accessibility implications when removing standard text affordances users expect.
- Failing to test on multiple iOS versions where edit menu behavior differs subtly.
Summary
To disable Copy, Cut, Select, and Select All in UITextView, use a subclass that denies edit actions and suppresses selection UI. Keep the restriction local to sensitive contexts, and configure isEditable/isSelectable according to desired behavior. Validate on target iOS versions, especially around edit menu changes, and provide accessibility cues or controlled alternatives when possible. With a clear policy-driven implementation, you can enforce content restrictions without destabilizing general text rendering.

