How to create ensemble in tensorflow?
ML System Design practice on Codemia
Design recommenders, ranking systems and training pipelines the way ML interviews actually ask for them, with worked solutions.
Introduction
In TensorFlow and Keras, the simplest ensemble is usually multiple trained models whose predictions are averaged. The modern way to build that is with the Keras Functional API and a merging layer such as Average, which gives you one reusable model object for inference and saving.
Train More Than One Base Model
An ensemble only helps if the base models are not making exactly the same mistakes. One simple way to create diversity is to change width, dropout, or random seed:
The goal is not to make the models wildly different. It is to avoid several identical copies that contribute little ensemble benefit.
Build A Keras Averaging Ensemble
Once the base models are trained, combine them into one graph:
This uses the Keras Average layer, which is the cleanest way to express element-wise averaging in a model graph.
Because the ensemble is still a Keras model, you can call predict, evaluate, and save on it normally.
Weighted Averaging Is Also Easy
If one model is consistently stronger, a weighted average may perform better:
Choose weights based on validation results, not intuition alone.
If the weighted ensemble is not better than plain averaging, prefer the simpler mean.
Classification Usually Averages Probabilities
For classification, the usual pattern is to average predicted probabilities instead of hard labels:
Averaging hard labels throws away confidence information too early. Probabilities preserve more signal for the ensemble.
Save The Ensemble Like Any Other Model
Because the ensemble is one Keras graph, saving is normal:
That is a major advantage over ad hoc Python-side averaging code, which often complicates deployment.
It also keeps the serving path aligned with training-time evaluation, because the same model object that you validated is the one you can export and deploy.
Common Pitfalls
One common mistake is training several base models that are effectively identical and then expecting a large ensemble gain.
Another issue is evaluating the ensemble without comparing it against the best individual model on the same validation set.
A third problem is choosing weighted averages without evidence that the chosen weights improve validation performance.
Finally, some teams build a Python-only averaging wrapper instead of a Keras model graph, which makes saving and serving more awkward than necessary.
Summary
- The easiest TensorFlow ensemble is multiple Keras models combined with an averaging layer.
- Base models should differ enough to make partially different errors.
- Start with plain averaging before trying weighted combinations.
- For classification, average probabilities rather than hard labels.
- Build the ensemble as one Keras model so evaluation, saving, and serving stay simple.
Related reading
- How to deal with batches with variable-length sequences in TensorFlow?
- How to deal with large2GB embedding lookup table in tensorflow?
- How to deal with large csv file when training a deep learning model?
- How to deal with multi step time series forecasting in multivariate LSTM in keras
- How to create Keras model with optional inputs
- How to create only one copy of graph in tensorboard events file with custom tf.Estimator?
- How to create own dataset for using Mask-RCNN models from the Tensorflow Object Detection API?
- How to deal with array of string features in traditional machine learning?
.png&w=3840&q=75)
Tackling System Design Interview Problems
A short course that equips you with the skills to approach system design interviews methodically.
Start the free courseTrack what you have practised
A free account saves your progress, solutions and study plan across every problem on Codemia.
ML System Design practice on Codemia
Design recommenders, ranking systems and training pipelines the way ML interviews actually ask for them, with worked solutions.