Is it idiomatically ok to put algorithm into class?
Data Structures & Algorithms practice on Codemia
Step through 300 algorithm problems with animated visualisers that show the data structure changing as the code runs.
Introduction
The intersection between algorithms and object-oriented programming (OOP) often raises debates among developers about structure and design patterns. Specifically, it's common to encounter the question: is it idiomatically correct to encapsulate an algorithm within a class? This topic addresses both practical and theoretical aspects of software design, significantly contributing to how code is structured, maintained, and scaled.
Key Considerations
When deciding whether to encapsulate an algorithm inside a class, consider the following:
- Encapsulation:
- Encapsulation is a fundamental principle of OOP, promoting data hiding and modular design. Encapsulating an algorithm within a class can help create a modular design, ensuring that the algorithm's intricacies are hidden behind predictable interfaces.
- Reusability:
- Wrapping an algorithm in a class can enhance reusability. It can be reused across multiple applications by simply instantiating an object.
- Flexibility:
- Classes can provide the flexibility needed for creating multiple algorithms with variants, by enabling the use of polymorphism and inheritance.
- Responsibility:
- The Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) demands that classes should have one responsibility. If the algorithm is the only focus, putting it inside a class can be considered idiomatic, as the class solely manages the algorithm and its variations.
Technical Explanation
An algorithm, at its core, is a sequence of instructions designed for a specific task. When paired with OOP, the management of state and behavior becomes more nuanced. Let's delve into a practical example with Python:
- Strategy Pattern:
- The strategy pattern is particularly relevant here. It encapsulates an algorithm within a class, allowing the algorithm to be changed at runtime. This pattern is useful when multiple algorithms are necessary for a single family of tasks.
- Overhead:
- Wrapping an algorithm in a class can introduce minor overhead in terms of memory and computation. However, these are often negligible compared to the benefits of maintainability and readability.
- Scalability:
- Writing algorithms within classes typically promotes better scalability. As requirements evolve, developers can extend functionalities or introduce new algorithms with less friction.
Related reading
- Is it possible for a vector clock to be greater than another but they are not ancestor related?
- Is it possible for compression algorithms to generate identical output for two different files?
- Is it possible to achieve Huffman decoding in GPU?
- Is it possible to add a weight/probability to a node in graph theoryusing networkx
- Is it possible to build a Fenwick tree in On?
- Is it possible to compare two binary trees in less than On log n time?
- Is it possible to count the number of distinct substrings in a string in On?
- Is it possible to do an inplace merge without temporary storage?

DSA Fundamentals
Master algorithmic patterns and data structures through hands-on LeetCode-style problems - from arrays and hashing to dynamic programming and advanced graphs.
View the courseTrack what you have practised
A free account saves your progress, solutions and study plan across every problem on Codemia.
Data Structures & Algorithms practice on Codemia
Step through 300 algorithm problems with animated visualisers that show the data structure changing as the code runs.