Keras Binary_crossentropy has negative values
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
Keras is a high-level neural networks API, written in Python, that runs on top of TensorFlow. It's known for its ease of use and the fact that it makes prototyping deep learning models quick and accessible. One of the most commonly used loss functions in Keras, especially for binary classification tasks, is `binary_crossentropy`.
Understanding Binary Crossentropy
The binary crossentropy loss function, often referred to as log loss, measures the performance of a classification model whose output is a probability value between 0 and 1. Intuitively, it quantifies the divergence between the predicted probabilities and the actual labels. The lower the loss, the better the model's predictions.
The formula for binary crossentropy is:
Where: • is the number of samples. • is the actual binary label (0 or 1). • is the predicted probability (between 0 and 1).
Potential Causes for Negative Binary Crossentropy
Despite being described as a loss, which one might expect to be non-negative, practitioners sometimes notice that the binary crossentropy can yield negative values. Understanding why requires a deeper examination:
- Logarithmic Nature: The logarithm of a number between 0 and 1 (such as probabilities) is negative. If the predicted probabilities are very close to 0 for a true label of 1, or very close to 1 for a true label of 0, the corresponding log term can be quite large in magnitude, outweighing other terms and resulting in a negative sum.
- Error in Implementation: Occasionally, custom or erroneous implementations mistakenly adjust the loss or improperly scale inputs, leading to an unintuitive negative output. This is not common with the standard implementations as found in Keras.
- Using Logits Directly: When models output logits (unnormalized log probabilities), if these are directly fed into the crossentropy function without proper application of a sigmoid function to output them as probabilities, it can yield unexpected results, including negative values.
- Floating Point Precision: Precision issues in floating point arithmetic, particularly in a deep learning framework, can occasionally yield results slightly off from expected values, including negative losses. This is more likely in edge cases and extreme value scenarios.
Mitigating Negative `Loss` Values
Mitigating these occurrences involves ensuring practices that align with the intended use of binary crossentropy:
• Correct Preprocessing: Check that the output of your model is a probability between 0 and 1. Ensure that a sigmoid activation has been applied in the last layer for binary classification problems.
• Correct Implementation: Use the tested and stable implementations provided by libraries like Keras. If using custom loss functions, ensure that mathematical computations align with the intended probabilities and logarithmic operations.
• Debugging Small Values: Investigate the values of and in any batch producing negative loss values. Check for any outliers or unexpected pattern in data preprocessing or model prediction stages.
Below is a summary table of potential causes and solutions:
| Potential Causes | Explanation/Example | Mitigation Measures |
| Logarithmic Nature | Large magnitude due to log of small probabilities | Ensure probabilities (not logits) are used |
| Error in Implementation | Faulty loss computation logic | Use standard library functions |
| Using Logits Directly | Logits mistaken as probabilities | Apply sigmoid to logits before feeding to loss function |
| Floating Point Precision | Small inaccuracies in numerical operations | Increase numerical stability by evaluating inputs |
Example
Here's an example of correctly setting up a binary classification model in Keras:

