Need sample fire and forget async call to WCF service
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.
Introduction
In WCF, a fire-and-forget call is about returning control to the caller quickly, not guaranteeing that downstream processing completed. This is useful for non-critical side effects such as telemetry and best-effort audit logs. For critical workflows, you should use durable messaging rather than pure in-memory background dispatch.
What Fire-and-Forget Means in Practice
A caller can continue immediately while background code attempts to deliver a WCF message. The request appears fast, but failures can still occur after the caller has already moved on.
That means you need to answer two design questions early:
- Can this event be lost occasionally.
- What should happen when outbound queue is full.
If event loss is unacceptable, fire-and-forget is the wrong model.
One-Way WCF Contract Example
WCF supports one-way operations using IsOneWay = true. This avoids waiting for response payloads.
One-way improves caller latency, but it still does not imply durable delivery.
Bounded Background Dispatcher Pattern
A practical implementation is to queue events in memory and process them in a single background worker.
This is best-effort by design and should be documented that way.
Usage from Application Flow
Request handlers enqueue and return quickly.
A clear queue-full policy avoids surprise behavior during traffic spikes.
When to Use Durable Messaging Instead
If compliance, billing, or legal auditing depends on the event, move to durable queue infrastructure.
Reliability features you need in that case:
- Persist before acknowledging caller.
- Retry with backoff.
- Dead-letter capture for poison events.
- Monitoring for backlog age and send failures.
In WCF ecosystems this can involve MSMQ-backed services or migration to a dedicated broker.
Operational Checks Before Production
Run failure drills, not just happy-path tests.
Test at least:
- Endpoint unavailable for several minutes.
- Queue reaches capacity.
- Process restarts with pending items.
- Credentials or certificates expire.
Track dropped events and recovery time. If loss is too high, redesign to durable delivery.
Common Pitfalls
- Assuming one-way WCF operations guarantee eventual processing.
- Using unbounded in-memory queues and risking memory exhaustion.
- Hiding failures by skipping logs and metrics for background sends.
- Using fire-and-forget for business-critical or compliance-critical events.
- Not defining queue overflow behavior until after incidents occur.
Summary
- Fire-and-forget optimizes caller latency, not delivery guarantees.
- One-way WCF contracts are useful for non-critical side effects.
- Use bounded queues and explicit failure visibility for best-effort designs.
- Choose durable messaging when event loss is unacceptable.
- Define overflow, retry, and shutdown policy before release.
Related reading
- need some clarifications about dispatch queue, thread and NSRunLoop
- Need to understand the usage of SemaphoreSlim
- Nested Async Await Does not Wait
- Nested Async/Await Doesn't Appear To Be Scaling
- Nested TaskT calls without async/await
- NestJS - Task Scheduling - Prevent running the same Job in parallel in identical service instances in K8s
- .NET - Dictionary locking vs. ConcurrentDictionary
- .NET async webservice call with a callback
.png&w=3840&q=75)
Tackling System Design Interview Problems
A short course that equips you with the skills to approach system design interviews methodically.
Start the free courseTrack what you have practised
A free account saves your progress, solutions and study plan across every problem on Codemia.
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.