Web Servers
Tomcat
JBoss
Glassfish
Server Comparison

What is the difference between Tomcat, JBoss and Glassfish?

Master System Design with Codemia

Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.

In the landscape of Java-based web servers and application servers, three prominent names are often mentioned: Apache Tomcat, JBoss (now known as WildFly), and GlassFish. These servers are integral for deploying and managing Java applications, but each serves different needs and comes with its own set of features.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat is primarily a web server and a servlet container that is used to deploy Java Servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP). It is a lightweight solution designed to serve Java applications that follow the Jakarta EE (formerly Java EE) web specifications. Tomcat is managed by the Apache Software Foundation, and it is well-known for its performance, scalability, and configurability.

Technical Aspects

Tomcat operates on the Java platform, which means it requires a Java Runtime Environment (JRE) to run. It implements the Jakarta Servlet and JavaServer Pages specifications but does not support the full Jakarta EE stack. This means it can't natively manage EJB (Enterprise Java Beans) components or JMS (Java Messaging Service). However, it's often used in production environments for serving large-scale web applications due to its robustness and high performance.

JBoss / WildFly

JBoss, which has been renamed to WildFly, is a full Jakarta EE application server provided by Red Hat. It offers a rich set of functionalities that are beyond simple servlet container capabilities of Tomcat. WildFly includes support for the full Jakarta EE suite, including technologies like EJB, JPA (Java Persistence API), JMS, among others, which are not natively supported by Tomcat.

Technical Aspects

WildFly is not just limited to a servlet container; it is a comprehensive Jakarta EE server that can handle a wide array of enterprise-grade Java applications. Features like clustering, failover, distributed caching, and advanced transaction management make it suitable for applications that demand high availability and robust performance management. It also provides a management console and an extensive set of administration tools that aid in deploying and managing enterprise applications efficiently.

GlassFish

GlassFish is another full-platform Jakarta EE application server originally developed by Sun Microsystems, which was later acquired by Oracle Corporation. Like WildFly, GlassFish supports the full spectrum of the Jakarta EE APIs. It is often praised for its clean administration interface and straightforward usability.

Technical Aspects

GlassFish serves as a reference implementation for Jakarta EE, which means it includes all the latest features specified in the standard. This makes it ideal for developers who want to work with the newest features of Jakarta EE. However, it’s important to note that while Oracle does continue to support GlassFish, its primary push for commercial support has shifted towards the Oracle WebLogic Server.

Comparative Analysis

Here's how these servers stack up against each other in different technical and functional areas:

FeatureApache TomcatJBoss / WildFlyGlassFish
TypeWeb server / Servlet containerFull Jakarta EE Application ServerFull Jakarta EE Application Server
Jakarta EE Full ProfileNoYesYes
LightweightYesNoNo
Management ConsoleMinimalExtensiveExtensive
Cloud OptimizationGoodExcellentGood
PerformanceHigh efficiency for web appsHigh performance for enterprise appsBalanced
Best Use CaseSimple web applications or front-end web server in enterprise environmentsComplex enterprise environments needing full EE featuresDevelopers needing to work with the latest Jakarta EE features

Conclusion

Choosing between Apache Tomcat, JBoss/WildFly, and GlassFish depends largely on the requirements of the project. For simpler, lightweight, or web-front applications, Tomcat might be adequate. For more complex enterprise-level applications requiring robust Jakarta EE support, either JBoss/WildFly or GlassFish would be suitable, with the choice depending on other factors like developer preference for management tools or specific enterprise features. Each of these servers brings its strengths and caters to different segments of the market, making them valuable depending on the specific needs of the deployment scenario.


Course illustration
Course illustration

All Rights Reserved.