When should I use a struct instead of a class?
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.
In software development, especially in languages such as C++ and C#, the choice between using structs and classes can have significant implications on the performance, design, and maintainability of your code. The decision largely depends on the use case and the specific features of the language in question. This article aims to explore various aspects of when and why you might choose to use a struct instead of a class.
Understanding Structs and Classes
Struct
In many programming languages, a struct is a value type. This means that when you assign a struct to a new variable or pass it to a function, a complete copy of the original value is created. Here are some characteristics of structs, using C# and C++ as references:
- Value Type: Structs are stored on the stack, which can lead to better performance in certain scenarios, such as when dealing with small data structures.
- Suitability for Small, Simple Data Structures: They are ideal for representing lightweight objects like points, complex numbers, or RGB colors that have a short lifespan or are not modified frequently.
- No Inheritance Support: Structs do not support inheritance. However, they can implement interfaces.
- Immutable: It is often recommended that structs be immutable. This means they should not have any method that modifies their internal state after creation.
Class
Classes, in contrast, are reference types. This means that when you work with an object of a class, you are actually working with a reference to that memory location.
- Reference Type: Classes are stored on the heap, and the reference is stored on the stack.
- Complex Data Structures: More suitable for large or complex objects that might need to be shared across different parts of an application.
- Support for Inheritance: Classes fully support inheritance and polymorphism. They are the backbone of object-oriented programming.
- Can Be Mutable: Classes can have properties or methods that alter their state.
When to Use Structs
- Performance Needs: If your application requires high performance and you're dealing with small-sized data, using structs can prevent heap fragmentation and reduce garbage collection overhead (in languages like C#).
- Data Immutability: When you want to define a small immutable value, such as a coordinate or a color value, a struct is a strong choice. This ensures thread safety without requiring complex logic.
- Short-lived Variables: Structs make sense for variables with a limited scope and lifespan, which do not need to persist beyond the scope of the current method.
- Simple Data Structure: If your data is straightforward and lacks the complexity that would benefit from object-oriented features like polymorphism or inheritance, a struct is appropriate.
When to Use Classes
- Complex Data Models: For complex and large data structures, classes are typically the better choice due to their flexibility and capabilities around inheritance and polymorphism.
- Reference Sharing: If you need to share instances across various parts of an application and allow modifications, classes provide referential semantics.
- Lifetime Management: For objects managed by a garbage collector (like in Java or C#), objects with dynamic lifetimes benefit from being classes due to the automatic memory management.
- Mutable State: When the object must frequently change state, a class is preferred since it allows for mutable fields and properties.
Performance Considerations
While structs provide stack allocation benefits, excessive copying can degrade performance, especially when structs grow larger than a few fields. It's critical to consider the balance between memory usage and the cost of passing copies around. Classes are generally more efficient for larger data objects or scenarios requiring shared state.
Example Scenarios
Example in C#:
In this example, Point is a good candidate for a struct due to its immutability and simplicity. Circle, however, benefits from being a class due to its potential for complexity and shared state.
Struct vs. Class Summary Table
| Feature/Usage | Struct | Class |
| Type | Value Type | Reference Type |
| Memory Allocation | Stack | Heap |
| Inheritance | No (except interfaces) | Yes |
| Ideal for | Small, immutable data Short-lived objects Performance-critical applications | Complex objects Shared state Mutable data |
| Copy Semantics | By value (copy) | By reference |
| Mutability Recommendation | Often immutable | Can be mutable |
| Performance Concerns | Can be efficient for small data, costly for large structs due to copying | Managed by garbage collector can affect performance in frequent allocations |
Conclusion
Choosing between structs and classes is not merely a technical decision; it should be informed by the problem you are trying to solve. Opt for structs when dealing with simple, immutable objects that can benefit from stack allocation. On the other hand, pick classes for complex, mutable, or shared state objects that can leverage the power of object-oriented programming. Assessing the trade-offs in terms of performance and design flexibility will lead to the most efficient and maintainable solution for your project.
Related reading
- When should I use async controllers in ASP.NET MVC?
- When should I use GC.SuppressFinalize?
- When should I use LazyT?
- When should I use SnapsToDevicePixels in WPF 4.0?
- When should I use the HashSetT type?
- When should I use using blocks in C?
- When should TaskCompletionSourceT be used?
- When should the volatile keyword be used in C?

OOD Fundamentals
Master object-oriented design from first principles, SOLID, design patterns, and classic interview problems with hands-on coding.
View the courseTrack what you have practised
A free account saves your progress, solutions and study plan across every problem on Codemia.
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.