Why use a ReentrantLock if one can use synchronizedthis?
Master System Design with Codemia
Enhance your system design skills with over 120 practice problems, detailed solutions, and hands-on exercises.
In the Java programming language, managing access to shared resources by multiple threads is a critical task that requires effective synchronization techniques. The synchronized keyword and ReentrantLock are two essential tools provided by the Java concurrency framework to handle this task. Understanding why one might choose ReentrantLock over synchronized can influence the design and performance of multithreaded applications.
Synchronized Mechanism
The synchronized keyword in Java is a built-in synchronization mechanism. By using synchronized, developers can ensure that only one thread executes a code block at a time for a given object monitor. It is straightforward and easy to use, as shown in the following example:
Key Characteristics of synchronized:
- Ease of Use: Simple to implement locking on methods or code blocks.
- Implicit Locking: Automatically acquires and releases locks, reducing the risk of programming errors.
- Fairness: Lacks fairness in acquiring locks, potentially leading to thread starvation.
- Monitor Association: Locks are associated with the specific object it synchronizes on.
ReentrantLock Class
The ReentrantLock class is part of the java.util.concurrent.locks package and provides more sophisticated locking capabilities compared to synchronized. It allows for greater flexibility in handling locks, which can be beneficial in complex concurrent scenarios.
Key Advantages of ReentrantLock:
- Lock Flexibility & Control: Offers methods such as
lockInterruptibly(),tryLock(), andunlock()for advanced lock management. - Condition Variables: Supports multiple
Conditionobjects for finer-grained control over thread coordination. - Fairness Policies: Can be configured with fairness settings to ensure first-come-first-serve lock granting.
- Lock State Inquiry: Provides the ability to monitor lock state, such as checking if a lock is held by the current thread through methods like
isHeldByCurrentThread().
Technical Example:
Detailed Comparison
The choice between synchronized and ReentrantLock often depends on the specific requirements of the application. Below is a detailed comparison:
| Feature | synchronized | ReentrantLock |
| Lock Acquisition | Implicit (automatic handling) | Explicit (manual handling) |
| Readability & Simplicity | High | Moderate |
| Fairness Options | No | Yes, configurable with fairness policy |
| Interruptible Locking | No | Yes, supports lockInterruptibly() |
| Multiple Conditions | No | Yes, supports multiple Condition objects |
| Performance | Lightweight, often quicker for simple locks | Efficient for complex locking scenarios |
| Deadlock Handling | Basic (harder to handle) | Better (with tryLock()) |
Advanced Features of ReentrantLock
Fairness Policy
By default, ReentrantLock does not implement any fairness policy, meaning that thread scheduling might be arbitrary. However, ReentrantLock can be initialized with a fairness parameter:
This ensures that the longest-waiting thread is granted the lock first, reducing thread starvation.
Interruptible Locking
With methods like lockInterruptibly(), threads can acquire a lock while also being able to respond to interruption requests, which is not possible with synchronized.
Conditions
ReentrantLock supports condition variables, enabling more granular control over thread communication compared to synchronized.
Conclusion
While synchronized remains a robust and easy-to-use mechanism for many basic concurrency tasks, ReentrantLock offers additional capabilities and fine-grained control that can be advantageous in complex multithreading situations. Choosing between them involves weighing factors like performance, code complexity, and the specific synchronization requirements of the application. Understanding and leveraging the strengths of each mechanism is key to developing efficient and reliable concurrent applications.

