Handle concurrent requests to update the resources
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.
When developing scalable web applications, handling concurrent requests to update resources efficiently and accurately becomes a fundamental requirement. This challenge typically involves multiple users or processes attempting to alter a single piece of data simultaneously, which can lead to a range of issues including lost updates, inconsistent data, and errors. To manage these issues effectively, developers implement various strategies to control how data is read, modified, and written back to the database or storage system.
Concurrency Control Strategies
Several strategies can be employed to handle concurrency in applications. These include:
1. Pessimistic Locking
Pessimistic locking assumes that conflicts are likely to happen and thus locks the resources for the duration of a transaction. This can prevent other transactions from modifying or even reading the locked data depending on the lock level until the initial transaction is completed. This form of locking is straightforward and safe but can lead to bottlenecks, reducing the system’s overall throughput.
2. Optimistic Locking
Optimistic locking allows concurrent transactions more freedom by assuming conflicts are rare. Instead of locking the resources at the start of a transaction, it proceeds with the transaction and checks at the time of commit whether other transactions have modified the data. This is typically implemented using version numbers or timestamps. If a conflict is detected (i.e., the data has been changed by another transaction), the transaction is rolled back.
3. Using Database Isolation Levels
Most relational database systems provide various isolation levels that define how transactions interact with each other. These are defined in the SQL standard and include Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read, and Serializable. Each level offers a different balance between performance and consistency, with higher isolation levels preventing phenomena like dirty reads, non-repeatable reads, and phantom reads but at a potential cost to transaction throughput.
4. Entity Tag (ETag)
Particularly in web development for APIs, the ETag mechanism can be used to handle concurrency. An ETag is a response header returned by an HTTP request and represents a fingerprint of the resource. When the client wants to update that resource, it sends the ETag along with the request. The server will only process the request if the ETag matches the current state of the resource.
Handling Concurrency in Practice: A Technical Example
Consider a web application with an API that allows users to update a profile object. Here's how optimistic locking could be handled in a pseudo code implementation:
In this example, each profile object includes a version number. When fetching the profile, its current version is checked against the version provided by the client, which should match the version at the time the client last retrieved the resource. If they do not match, the server aborts the transaction with a conflict error, prompting the client to fetch the latest data and retry their changes.
Summary Table: Comparison of Approaches
| Strategy | When to Use | Pros | Cons |
| Pessimistic Locking | High conflict likelihood | Simple; Prevents conflicts | Low throughput; scalability issues |
| Optimistic Locking | Low conflict likelihood | Higher throughput | Complex handling of conflicts |
| Database Isolation | Depends on specific requirements | Customizable | Can be complex to configure optimally |
| ETag | Stateless environments like RESTful APIs | Low overhead; Scalable | Requires careful management of ETag values |
Additional Considerations
When implementing concurrency control, it's essential to balance the potential performance impact against the need for accuracy and data integrity. Monitoring and logging are crucial for understanding how the chosen strategy affects the system under real-world loads and may inform adjustments to concurrency control mechanisms as application use evolves.
In summary, handling concurrent requests to update resources requires a strategic approach informed by the specific needs and context of the application. By carefully choosing and implementing the appropriate mechanisms, developers can ensure data integrity and provide a smooth, efficient user experience.
Related reading
- Handler vs AsyncTask vs Thread
- Handler vs AsyncTask vs Thread
- Handling asynchronous database queries in node.js and mongodb
- Handling exceptions from Java ExecutorService tasks
- Handling exceptions from Java ExecutorService tasks
- Handling interdependent and/or layered asynchronous calls
- Handling InterruptedException in Java
- Handling multiple returns asynchronously in node.js
.png&w=3840&q=75)
Tackling System Design Interview Problems
A short course that equips you with the skills to approach system design interviews methodically.
Start the free courseTrack what you have practised
A free account saves your progress, solutions and study plan across every problem on Codemia.
Interview Questions practice on Codemia
Over 8,000 real interview questions from top companies, searchable by company and role.